Her review DID comply with your rules. Furthermore, it was correct and true and her genuine lived experience with Nanogames.io
If you don't think it was accurate or true, I suggest that you go to trust pilot and read other players experiences.
I have read it and it absolutely proved that they manipulated roulette. They admitted it AND paid that player money to keep quiet about it. That's enough proof for me
Exactly no review should have to be "evaluated".…..for what ? To see if you agree with it ? This is not right
Her review DID comply with your rules. Furthermore, it was correct and true and her genuine lived experience with Nanogames.io
If you don't think it was accurate or true, I suggest that you go to trust pilot and read other players experiences.
I'm just wondering why you need to create another account to address the same situation. It's not pretty honest, if you ask me. The same goes for the highly unproved yet very untruthful reviews you've posted on the Trust Pilot site. Two times, what a coincidence, right? We won't tolerate such an approach hence, I'm banning your account for trying to cause reputation damage.
If you can't play it fair, you are not welcome anymore.
Cursos profissionais educacionais gratuitos para funcionários de casinos online vocacionados para as melhores práticas do setor, melhoria da experiência do jogador e uma abordagem justa ao jogo.
Lançamos esta iniciativa com o objetivo de criar um sistema global de autoexclusão, que permitirá que os jogadores vulneráveis bloqueiem o seu acesso a todas as oportunidades de jogo online.
