há um ano
I know that the banker has slightly better odds, but I don't base my bets on the banker.
I use a mix of martingale and endurance betting methods.
In your opinion, is my method a bit risky?
how many consecutive times have you lost at live bacaratt?
1
2
Adicionar post
há um ano
I'd say it would need a further explanation. In general, Martingale isn't considered a valid strategy, so it depends on the other part you mentioned.
Do you keep bets, loss, and winnings statistics - that should help you define whether this mix is indeed a good choice if you ask me.
1
Anonymized405
há um ano
Frankly, I'm beginner at baccarat, but I like it and like to know how to play well.
I don't understand double account strategy you mentioned.
could you explain little bit more detail?
há um ano
Yeah, I agree.
That's why I always the result table for checking win or loss statistics.
1
Anonymized405
há um ano
Dear Pandra - this is very close to forbidden strategies - if you ask me. It's not worth the risk!
Have you read this part?
How to win at baccarat?
One of the options consists in finding online casinos with the most favourable conditions. Sometimes online casinos organise promotional events where they offer a reduced commission or a higher payout in the event of a tie, in order to attract new players and increase its turnover. To reverse the house edge in favour of the player, the casino would have to pay a tie in a ratio higher than 9.51: 1, or reduce the fee for each bet on the banker to under 2.69%. However, we consider the chance of finding a reputable casino that has accidentally set the rules in favour of the player to be very low. If you find such conditions, be sure to refer to the business’s terms and conditions and to thoroughly check the casino´s reputation.
Nothing about creating multiple account to sit in the same table!
If I may suggest,
swith to the BlackJack which offers better odds, and also playing several hands on one table is allowed officially.
I really thing you should learn more about the rules to stay withing the allowed gameplay.
Anyway, I'll say it again MARTINGALE DOESN'T WORK. 🙂 Please don't advise players to aply non working strategies.
há um ano
If I may warn you, don't fall into the idea that Martingale still works - it doesn't.
I suggest you read this whole guide section:
https://casino.guru/Strategy-for-playing-Baccarat-Punto-Banco
This article explains why the suggested strategy doesn't work 🙂.
Then I would recommend focusing on "The basic rules of Baccarat Punto Banco" to give you a hint of what you should expect. Make sure to read the whole section, especially if you plan to play using real money.🙏
1
há um ano
haha, thank you, Radka.
But Pandra will not advise me to apply martingale only. And will not apply, too.
Anonymized405
há um ano
Now I get it! Thank you so much for your thorough explanation.
As Radka suggested, I'll make sure to check the casino's rules before attempting to play with double accounts.
Let's avoid any risky situations.
1
há um ano
Thank you, Radka. really!
But I have another question for you.
Are there any articles or guides about using a "mixed strategy with Martingale"?
I understand that relying solely on Martingale is not advised as you said, but I believe it can be a good strategy if I manage to control my greed and avoid taking unnecessary risks.
há um ano
Postado por Anonymized405 foi apagado
há um ano
Pandra - you're wrong 🙂
Do you truly believe any casino would state in its terms "You are not allowed to create more than one account anywhere and you are also not allowed to use those forbidden accounts to play at the same table...
That's nonsense. Always read the part about "forbidden strategies" instead.
Playing on two devices at the same time, on the same table, is quite a risk! Once the casino finds out, your risking your account will get closed permanently and you will be flagged.
I don't think it's worth it.
You know what? Ask the support for an opinion on this whole idea. 🙂
Editado pelo autor há um ano
há um ano
Postado por Anonymized405 foi apagado
há um ano
Using just one account is normal. 🙂 For you - recommended.
há um ano
Thank you, Radka. really!
But I have another question for you.
Are there any articles or guides about using a "mixed strategy with Martingale"?
I understand that relying solely on Martingale is not advised as you said, but I believe it can be a good strategy if I manage to control my greed and avoid taking unnecessary risks.
há um ano
Hello 🙂
I would say the game itself isn't really rewarding, hence it's not about tempering the passion - if I may say 😀.
Mind this article fully:
https://casino.guru/Strategy-for-playing-Baccarat-Punto-Banco:
As you can see, there exists no working strategy for playing and winning over the casino at Punto Banco baccarat. Please forget such strategies. If you follow them, your enjoyment of the game will be spoilt by the limitations such strategies set. There will be no financial benefit for you. Do not look for the non-existent, get-rich-quick scheme, the Holy Grail for the gambler. Despite all of this, there are certain rules that would be sensible to follow. I would definitely not name these rules as a strategy, but rather as basic principles.
Principles of playing baccarat
do not bet on a tie
bet on the banker more often than not
find a casino with the most advantageous conditions (low commission, lower number of decks of cards)
keep your money well managed–bet the lowest possible sums
define the maximum acceptable loss in advance
I'm sorry, seems this is just a game of fun.
Anonymized405
há um ano
I concur that most casinos might not be too concerned about how many accounts a player holds.
Yet, I believe Radka's aim was to caution Casino Guru users to prevent their accounts from being suspended for minor reasons at their chosen casino. We do use Casino Guru to exchange common insights and to help each other steer clear of potential risks, right?
Let's keep a positive mindset, buddy 🙂
1
Anonymized405
há um ano
This is a common practice used to enhance the player's experiences. Don't say such kind of software is only used to deceive players - it's not. If you don't trust this technology, don't play.
há um ano
I concur that most casinos might not be too concerned about how many accounts a player holds.
Yet, I believe Radka's aim was to caution Casino Guru users to prevent their accounts from being suspended for minor reasons at their chosen casino. We do use Casino Guru to exchange common insights and to help each other steer clear of potential risks, right?
Let's keep a positive mindset, buddy 🙂
há um ano
Right! 👌
há um ano
Postado por Anonymized405 foi apagado
há um ano
I'm on the side of a reasonable approach. 😀
I guess you should learn more about the industry first. Study the standards and common practices. Get yourself more familiar with the environment.
You know, reasonable people do not engage in blinded hatred.
I find an interesting complaint for you:
https://casino.guru/blizz-casino-the-player-s-account-got-blocked
The player has been accused of making opposite bets with another player while playing Baccarat.
"We have been made aware by our colleagues at Evolution that when playing on Blizz, you were taking part in what is known as ‘opposite betting’ with a player from another brand on the Evolution network whilst playing Baccarat."
From my perspective, this can actually happen if you play on two devices using different casino accounts.
If you don't believe in the casino or a game - don't play. If you don't trust casinos in general - don't play.
You pay the money to have some fun, focus on that, and if you realize there is no fun in playing anymore, it's time to find yourself a new hobby.
Editado pelo autor há um ano
há um ano
I suppose that's a collusion case, and I suppose everyone knows collusion is forbidden in all casinos without exception, I still think that would apply for someone playing against himself to abuse a bonus. While the casino is using a criminal activity clause to close the account, I'm not sure if that's actually the case because the amount is too small to be considered a money laundering attempt.
Still the player has a defense, if the other allegedly colluded player was playing from a different location, different casino, different connection and both used a different payment method not related to each other, the only possible proof to say they are colluded is by checking their gameplay and if they place the exact opposite bets with the exact same bet size, but that alone wouldn't be enough to prove they are colluded, since hundreds of players bet the same game at the same time it can happen that many players are playing with the same bet size and playing on opposites ends, what would be truly strange is that the allegedly colluded players had the exact same behavior when it comes to deposit and withdrawals patterns and if they don't play any other game where opposite betting is not possible (slots, gameshows, etc), and if the payment method is crypto then proving the collusion becomes hundreds times easier, as the casino only needs to conduct a chain analysis for the addresses used for deposits and withdrawals. This specific case is probably the most interesting one I have seen, it would be good to know the other player's view and the evidence the casino has, or knowing if the other player also got banned
há um ano
I agree.
The problem is that none of those analyzes is provided to any players.
In general, I'm just trying to stop Pandra from providing misleading or possibly harmful tactics. 🙂
há um ano
Yes, if someone does what Pandra says it can turn problematic, casinos ban users for less than that, while there are many casinos that don't mention that rule in their terms, there are others that directly mention opposite betting is forbidden, so yes it can be dangerous; losing funds over nothing
1
SunsetGaze
há um ano
As I see, among other things, we share the same opinion about game restrictions while the bonus is active. Especially when slots are discussed. Can you name casinos that lower the wagering contribution on those games rather than ban these completely?
1
1
2
