CasaFórumCasinosQuestion about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code

Question about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code (página 364)

 por kirekin
|
1.286.476 visualizações 10.166 respostas |
|
1...363 364 365...540
Jwright1998

Hi everyone long term follower i dont comment as much but read every message still.Hope everyone is doing well. I have ways to trigger a chargeback investiagtion it is unethical, very very time cosuming but should work depending on card brand rules i have put hours into coming up with this resolution. I havent gone into too much detail really dont think this is a safe space at all to be sharing details and is why i have refrained from commenting such processes.

Elijahanth

does unethical actually mean illegal

Im backing out for a bit myself will continue to read and try and help if I can my chargebacks only have a few weeks to go and im getting involved in a lot of other peoples stuff im not wanting to jeopardise my refunds in any way it might rile the banks if they know im doing this or anyone refers to me

Editado pelo autor
Dustyd

I prefer the term unethical lol.These casinos believe they are doing nothing illegal just doing unethical practices in there eyes,im just playing there game. It really was the only way the amount of research i put in was the only way i saw fit im honest unless your bank process on technicalties which is 0.01 % chance. The casinos r just pr***s they wont refund and most of the merchants are involved

paulmcewan05

What ive done mate. Just waiting on responses to fos complaint and final disputes. I have been completely done with these casinos just transactions from early last year now with fos.

Elijahanth

I like being in here helping etc but I need to protect my own interests bud so same here will step back a bit

paulmcewan05

Hi All, just thought I'd share an update. I mentioned in my last post that I was rejected by the bank and accused of Fraudulent activity for chargebacks using code 4840. I think there might have been a change in the MCC codes as I'm in the process of now escalating my issue to a complaint with the bank and im doing some thorough research of my own to ensure I have my ducks in a row. I thought I'd share this link which gives a description of tbe charge code we are all talking about which differs from the one I used in my original claim which I picked up from the template someone else added to this feed a while back.

The code I'm going to ref is 4849 - see below link. I'm on a mission now, ive had enough. So many of us have been scammed and exploited by these cowboys and its not fair. We're all on gamstop for a reason because we have problems and their rigged games and lack of payouts and transparency has sent me on a witch hunt to take this lot down.


Hope this helps you all. Will keep positing my progress.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/midmetrics.com/blog/reason-code-4849-exploring-mastercards-questionable-merchant-audit-program%3fhs_amp=true

Dingdong5

Hi mate, so did the bank say you was being fraudulent or did the merchant?

Postado por Applesandpears93 foi apagado
Postado por Applesandpears93 foi apagado

It's not available in UK so best keep away

Missdaisy

Looks a scam site big time one of many similar ones

Postado por Applesandpears93 foi apagado

Does anyone know if it’s true gambling transactions via bank transfer/Open Banking cannot be blocked like gambling card transactions as that is what various banks have told me seemingly to absolve themselves of any duty of care? I feel very silly now having made the vast majority of deposits via the SEPA transfer mechanism (although my bank still would not uphold my chargeback requests for card transactions to these dodgy Curacao sites a while back anyway). Thanks in advance anyone who can clarify.

Dustyd

The bank!

for casinos owned by Famagousta BV, has anyone successfully got a refund? Did anyone contact B90 holdings group? Thanks

Dingdong5

Which bank told you that? They are out of their mind?

Martin61

Nat**** - I'm in tbe process of raising a full complaint today to counteract all of this. If anything just given me more grounds now and a stronger counter argument against their duty of care to recognise my activity history previously. Have u raised a complaint with the bank?

Barclays is the best, they sorted me out, once all this crap is done i m closing my other accounts. Hsbc is useless. Doesent want to put it through as incorrect mcc, only as goods not received and they require "order confirmation ". Can t raise with natwest, tesco, m and s or lloyds due to being over 4 months so i contacted the merchants.

Openbanking / Transferência


Nenhum estorno possível, liberado apenas voluntariamente pelo banco recebedor. Cada banco cobra uma taxa para um estorno, geralmente € 10-15,00 por transação

Também é uma coisa boa que um recall só seja possível até certo ponto ou não seja possível de forma alguma, caso contrário, as transações de pagamento digital seriam caracterizadas por abuso. Eu compro um celular por 500,00 euros, pago por ele e simplesmente cancelo o pagamento... Isso seria bom demais para ser verdade.


O fato é que você não foi enganado ou explorado. Você fez os pagamentos voluntariamente e recebeu algo em troca. Se tivesse vencido, você teria pago.


Processar pagamentos usando um código falso não é um crime, é mais uma área cinzenta, não há parágrafo que o proíba. Se houvesse uma proibição, os tribunais tomariam medidas contra isso. Você é livre para tomar medidas legais para obter um julgamento inicial.

Alguns provedores já estão em uma lista negra interna de bancos e os pagamentos são bloqueados pelo banco.

O código 7995 é bloqueado pela maioria dos bancos, ou você mesmo pode configurar o bloqueio de apostas. A recodificação dos pagamentos tem a intenção de contornar o bloqueio. Os próprios sistemas bancários assumem que está tudo OK.

Você não pode punir o banco por algo que ele não sabe. A responsabilidade é sua, não do banco. Você é um adulto, ninguém precisa segurar sua mão como uma criança pequena.

FOS:

O ombudsman não faz uma avaliação legal, ele não é um advogado, ele decide com base em fatos. O fato é: o banco executou sua ordem de pagamento enviada, todo o resto é uma disputa de direito civil.


Traduzido automaticamente:
benwallace209

I've just had a reply from vipzino saying they are refunding 330 deposits!!! Let's see what happens but this is a shock. I've emailed all the casinos and they have all just thrown their t&c at me but this one has said yes and is processing refunds

1...363 364 365...540
Ir para a páginade 540 páginas

Adira à comunidade

Deve ter sessão iniciada para adicionar uma publicação.

Registar
flash-message-news
Notícias do Casino Guru – Siga as notícias diárias da indústria do jogo
Trustpilot_flash_alt
Qual a sua opinião sobre o Casino Guru? Partilhe a sua opinião
Siga-nos nas redes sociais – Posts diários, bónus sem depósito, novas slots e muito mais
Subscreva a nossa newsletter para obter os mais recentes bónus sem depósito, novas slots e outras notícias