FórumOutros Jogos de CasinoBalvinder sambhi quebrando o livro da roleta

Balvinder sambhi quebrando o livro da roleta (página 3)

há um ano por Kareva7
|
11053 visualizações 68 respostas |
|
12 3 4
Adicionar post
Kareva7
há 11 meses

You repeatedly promote the book, completely ignoring the facts presented to you. Now you've come up with a win of $1 for each spin with a bankroll of $350. Do you not remember the illustrations you posted in previous messages? Allow me to remind you. Here they are:

file

As you can see, I highlighted in red the profit from winnings for the initial bets in your progression. They range from 30 pence (bets in your scheme in British pounds) to 80 pence. At today's exchange rates, this amounts to 37 cents to 1 US dollar. And not always 1 US dollar, you know.

I've already demonstrated above that with the approach to bets you've indicated, you will inevitably lose. According to your own scheme, your loss would be £222 or £863 (I circled the total bankroll in blue). Returning this loss with winnings of 30-80 pence will likely take you several months, assuming fate is favorable to you, and you don't lose another £222 or £863.

What $350 bankroll are you mentioning when none of the options you provided contains such amounts, even when converting pounds to dollars? You're inventing something new as the discussion progresses. Ok, even if you have $350, you'll just loose it.

Your advertising is aimed at novice players who know little about roulette, and I presume they would willingly believe the fictions you're telling.

há 11 meses

Yes, now I see that my reply has been published. Thank you for that.

I wonder why your software doesn't pay as much attention to the messages from Kareva7, who's using this discussion solely for book promotion purposes, as it does to my messages? 🙂

Just look through her messages and count phrases "Balvinder sambhi", "2 corner system", "book Breaking the Roulette wheel" and try to find any other useful plot in those messages. It's plain as a piece of cake. 🙂

há 11 meses

That's good you spotted this. You're right about the book, but as far as it's in the right thread (about roulette) and no links included...Yeah, we're quite hesitant when if comes to deleting user's posts.

Daniel
há 11 meses

So, according to your explanation, if I, say, mention anything on YouTube without posting a link to it, it will be OK? I mean, if I say something like: 'Hey, guys, just look for 'some product name' on YouTube or Google to learn more about some roulette strategy!' — that will do?

Well, my experience in discussions here tells me I'll have some problems with that. 🙂

OK, I'm just kidding. 🙂 Let her promote the book since other people can share their thoughts about it, to keep newbies safe.

há 11 meses

You repeatedly promote the book, completely ignoring the facts presented to you. Now you've come up with a win of $1 for each spin with a bankroll of $350. Do you not remember the illustrations you posted in previous messages? Allow me to remind you. Here they are:

file

As you can see, I highlighted in red the profit from winnings for the initial bets in your progression. They range from 30 pence (bets in your scheme in British pounds) to 80 pence. At today's exchange rates, this amounts to 37 cents to 1 US dollar. And not always 1 US dollar, you know.

I've already demonstrated above that with the approach to bets you've indicated, you will inevitably lose. According to your own scheme, your loss would be £222 or £863 (I circled the total bankroll in blue). Returning this loss with winnings of 30-80 pence will likely take you several months, assuming fate is favorable to you, and you don't lose another £222 or £863.

What $350 bankroll are you mentioning when none of the options you provided contains such amounts, even when converting pounds to dollars? You're inventing something new as the discussion progresses. Ok, even if you have $350, you'll just loose it.

Your advertising is aimed at novice players who know little about roulette, and I presume they would willingly believe the fictions you're telling.

há 11 meses

Allo4ka I have posted 2 free winings systems at no cost. You have post 0 winnings systems.

Please post a no lose winning system and we can all check and see. I will be waiting for you post. Lets see.



há 11 meses

Allo4ka I have posted 2 free winings systems at no cost. You have post 0 winnings systems.

Please post a no lose winning system and we can all check and see. I will be waiting for you post. Lets see.



há 11 meses

Firstly, what two systems are you talking about? You wrote about one system concerning bets on 2 corners. The fact that different progressions and entry expectations are used there doesn't make this one game system two different ones.

Secondly, what you have posted is not a winning system. It doesn't work in the long run. I confirmed this with real examples on real roulette tables in various online casinos, showing that bets according to the system you specified would often exceed the limits set by your system.

Thirdly, as I mentioned before, your proposed strategy is not a system for continuous play in the long run, as you claim. It suggests waiting for a favorable situation, entering the game, winning, and waiting for the next entry into the game. This approach is not a strategy for the long run, as you assert.

Finally, I don't recall ever saying that I have any winning systems for you to demand that I publish them. I have various tactics that I mentioned in various topics on this forum, tactics that help win on one table for a short period. But any 'universal foolproof systems' — leave those tales for inexperienced users.

Here are a few tactics off the top of my head for short-term play:

  • Wait for the non-appearance of any category of even chances for a long time (for example, 20-21 misses on red) and bet on this category using the Martingale progression until you win, then stop and wait again;
  • Wait for the non-appearance of any dozen or column for a long time (for example, 25-28 misses in the first dozen) and bet on this category using the Fibonacci progression until you win, then stop and wait again;
  • Wait for consecutive hits of any one dozen or column for a long time (for example, 10-12 hits in the first column) and then bet on the other two, increasing the bet by 4 four times after each loss until you win, then stop and wait again;
  • Wait until the number of hits in any dozen or column in the last 50 spins is less than 8% (for example, 2 dozen hits in the last 50 spins occurred in only 6% of cases), then bet on that dozen using the Fibonacci progression until you win, then stop and wait again…

There are dozens of examples like these; I won't list them all. Each of them provides an opportunity to win in a very short distance in 1-5 spins. The situations I described occur on gaming tables all the time, allowing you to finish the game on one table and almost immediately go to another table and win there. If you are monitoring a sufficiently large number of tables simultaneously, as I do, for example.

há 11 meses

Free no lose 1 repeat corner betting system


There are 23 corner sets below

 

0  1   2  3

1  2   4  5

2  3   5  6

4  5   7  8

5  6   8  9

7  8  10 11

8  9  11 12

10 11 13 16

11 12 14 15

13 14 16 17

14 15 17 18

16 17 19 20

17 18 20 21

19 20 22 23

20 21 23 24

22 23 25 26

23 24 26 27

25 26 28 29

26 27 29 30

28 29 31 32

29 30 32 33

31 32 34 35

32 33 35 36

 

Each corner has its own count. I will use 8 9 11 12 corner for this example but you need to track all corners at the same time to track all corners.

 

This is a cycle system. This means when a number appears example 8 9 11 12, does a 8 9 11 12 the next direct spin appear? No count 1 then we wait for another 8 9 11 12 to appear. Yes then we reset back to 0 count.

 

1. Track all 23 possible corner sets simultaneously.

2. Any corner set must appear 65 times BEFORE you even start to bet.

3. After the 65th appearance that set is qualified and then you start to bet. You bet for one spin only. Now:

a) you hit -> it's over. Look/wait for another corner set qualification and start a new game.

b) you missed -> you wait for that very corner to appear again and repeat your bet again, for one spin only.

4. You can have up to 25 such 'attack attempts', using the progression Kareva7 provided above. The goal is to catch an immediate repeat.

 

 

betting chart on 1 corner

 

 66  1  

 67  1  

 68  1  

 69  1  

 70  1  

 71  2  

 72  2  

 73  2  

 74  3  

 75  3  

 76  4  

 77  4  

 78  5  

 79  5  

 80  6  

 81  6  

 82  7  

 83  8  

 84  9  

 85  10  

 86  12  

 87  15  

 88  15  

 89  18  

 90  20  

há 11 meses

Sr. KAREVA7....por favor

Eu, Zoran e a Sra. Allo4ka somos grandes conhecedores de roleta.

Não invente água quente para nós.

Conte essa história para novos jogadores inexperientes.

Você consegue entender de uma vez !!!

NÃO HÁ SISTEMA QUE TRAZ LUCRO CERTO.

o que você fez na esquina 8...9...11...12. ???

Bem, é exatamente o mesmo ângulo de qualquer ângulo de roleta, 1,2,4,5...13,14,16,17...28,29,31,32. É TUDO A MESMA COISA.

Seu cérebro consegue descobrir isso?

Todo jogador de roleta profissional e experiente não quer falar sobre um sistema. Todo jogador experiente de roleta tem suas próprias táticas individuais. E tudo se baseia no fato de que é possível obter lucro no curto prazo. E qual tática será aplicada depende da situação atual da mesa onde estamos jogando naquele momento.

A roleta online (roleta automática) funciona no sistema RNG. (GERADOR DE NÚMEROS ALEATÓRIOS) e tal sistema tem certos períodos em que lança setores mistos... quando lança os mesmos setores... quando um determinado setor sai abaixo da porcentagem e muito mais opções.

Sei como reconhecer esses momentos e construir o jogo atual com base nessa observação. Eu fico o mais curto possível nessa roleta. Eu tenho lucro e deixo essa roleta.

Você é mais chato com seu sistema para iniciantes. Você veio aqui divulgar um livro que tem 1 resenha, xaxaxa.

VOCÊ É ENGRAÇADO 🙂

Traduzido automaticamente:
há 11 meses

E não irei mais dialogar com KAREVA7 porque está muito abaixo do meu nível.

Traduzido automaticamente:
há 11 meses

Jedna od mojih pobeda. I poruči tom Belvinderu da ima jedan bolji igrač od njega. A to sam Ja

Editado por Jaro há 11 meses
Motivo: Video not working
há 11 meses





Deixe-me explicar o jogo anterior. Como eu adivinhei número 4 e depois 2.

Eu segui a roleta. Nos últimos 100 lances, o setor de 32 a 36 funcionou muito mal. Número 2 e 4, de forma alguma. Quando saiu o 19, simplesmente fiz a aposta principal no 2 e no 4. Poderia ter saído no 21..ou no 19..ou no 15, mas é tudo uma questão de probabilidade.

Já disse mais de uma vez: NÃO RECONHEÇO O FATOR SORTE. Isso é apenas uma palavra (felicidade).

E caiu 4, depois 2. Aconteceu. Ok..vamos em frente. Orfanell também caiu mal. Começo com base na análise dos lançamentos anteriores para favorecer o setor de giros zero e continuo em direção ao número 17. Deixei de fora a série pequena porque caiu no período anterior e com essas roletas automáticas existe uma regra que quando uma série tem muitas quedas também deve parar.

Você percebeu. Os melhores números que lhe deram um sinal positivo depois de 2 e 4 foram os órfãos...6...1...e finalmente 17 que trouxe o sinal positivo final. Também a repetição do número 35 foi lógica porque o baralho do setor zero não se repetiu

(não saiu 2 X seguidas muitos lances.) E logicamente eu aumentei. E aconteceu (aquela lei da probabilidade de novo) 😉

Depois do número 17 vencedor e de um pagamento de cerca de 53.000 rsd (450 euros), repeti o jogo para honrar a tacada. É assim que sempre é feito. Para ser sincero, esperava uma série pequena, mas o número 32 caiu. Teria um pequeno pagamento. A culpa é minha porque houve um lapso de concentração. Eu deveria ter jogado melhor.

Balanço final. Depósito inicial RSDC 3.300 (€25)...

............................ saída RSD 97.000 (€800)

E lembre-se da REGRA DE OURO:

Não deixe que a roleta o mantenha no jogo por mais de 30 minutos no máximo.

Porque então a concentração relaxa e o cérebro te puxa ainda mais para o jogo, surge um leve vício e uma vontade de conseguir mais. E esse é o erro de 98% dos jogadores. EXISTE A VANTAGEM DA ROLETA. E não em matemática.

A matemática está do lado da roleta só no papel, NA PRÁTICA NÃO ESTÁ!

Ela está do lado do jogador no curto prazo.

Então..não fique muito tempo na roleta...!

Saia e volte depois de 2 horas, quando o cérebro voltar a zero.

Editado pelo autor há 11 meses
Traduzido automaticamente:
há 11 meses

So, according to your explanation, if I, say, mention anything on YouTube without posting a link to it, it will be OK? I mean, if I say something like: 'Hey, guys, just look for 'some product name' on YouTube or Google to learn more about some roulette strategy!' — that will do?

Well, my experience in discussions here tells me I'll have some problems with that. 🙂

OK, I'm just kidding. 🙂 Let her promote the book since other people can share their thoughts about it, to keep newbies safe.

há 11 meses

I think it has already been explained how it works on this forum and Daniel also stated how it is. Hehe, but I noticed that you also wrote that you were joking, so I take it you already know the rules, because they were communicated with you. 🙂

Anyway, of course everyone can make a personal opinion who understands the roulette topic. 

zorans71
há 11 meses

JARO..por que o vídeo não funciona. Funciona para mim

Editado pelo autor há 11 meses
Traduzido automaticamente:
zorans71
há 11 meses

For me it said it was private and the only place I could get to was the main youtube page.

Jaro
há 11 meses

Então há algo para ajustar.. vou dar uma olhada

Traduzido automaticamente:
há 11 meses

O vídeo funciona?

Traduzido automaticamente:
zorans71
há 11 meses

zorans71- YES I am funny and I win. You play but lose. this why you will not post a winning system for to see and check. I have posted two free systems. Players can check they win every time. This is winning not losing with your losing tactics.


Every gambler say I am winner, where is your proof? there is no proof, No confirmations your a a long term winner. No articles, No books, Just talk with losses. I have not been playing roulette for 30 years but all I see is losers everywhere.


The only way to confirm winning or losing is post your system with exact conditions. we all test, then see results. Balvinder winning, zorans71 losing confirmed.

Kareva7
há 11 meses

Você está louco?

Qual sistema vencedor devemos configurar.

Bem, NÃO existe sistema vencedor. É por isso que não publicamos.

Foda-se, BELVINDER. adeus

Editado por Radka há 11 meses
Motivo: Linguagem abusiva
Traduzido automaticamente:
Kareva7
há 11 meses

You haven't provided a single piece of evidence that you win with any of your systems. Just words. I've shown you with real data from real casinos that it doesn't work. But you continue to prove something without any facts.

Your promotion won't work anymore: any user who starts reading this discussion will see that behind your words and your system, there is nothing but loss. It's unlikely that anyone will buy your book after this. Look for success somewhere else.

I've written to you about the conditions under which your system with 2 corners can work successfully, but it seems you don't care about that. You need to sell the book. 😂

Allo4ka
há 11 meses

Deixe ele ir. Não discuta. Ele escreve isso de propósito.

Enganar. Quando não nos correspondermos com ele, ele irá embora.

Traduzido automaticamente:
há 11 meses

O vídeo funciona?

Traduzido automaticamente:
há 11 meses

Works for me!

12 3 4

Adira à comunidade

Deve ter sessão iniciada para adicionar uma publicação.

Registar
flash-message-news
Notícias do Casino Guru – Siga as notícias diárias da indústria do jogo
Trustpilot_flash_alt
Qual a sua opinião sobre o Casino Guru? Partilhe a sua opinião
Siga-nos nas redes sociais – Posts diários, bónus sem depósito, novas slots e muito mais
Subscreva a nossa newsletter para obter os mais recentes bónus sem depósito, novas slots e outras notícias